Skip to content

2025-10-15 @ ALS 8.3.1

Date Created: 2025-10-15
Tags: ALS 831, Mac1, Huwe1

Kara's and Violla's first try at collecting diffuse data


Overall Goals

  1. (Try to) Optimize diffuse collection at 8.3.1
  2. Mac1 and Huwe1 collection, looping in the humidity box with sleeves
  3. Mac1 and Huwe1 collection, looping under the watershed with sleeves
  4. Take background at a few different positions
  5. Collect data at different temperatures with oil and/or sleeves

Participants

Kara and Violla


Data

Root directory at ALS: /data/mcfuser/ucsf/fraser/15Oct2025/diffuse

Beamline Settings

Converting the beamline from conventional cryo setup to room temperature, diffuse setup:

cryojet.com off
cryojet.com move out
wave.com 14000
tuneup.com
dcsmotor.com transmission 0.01
divergence.com 0.9 (had to play around here to get dose around 1000 Gy/s)
diode.com in
shutter.com open
flux.com

Day 1 Parameters

Parameter Value Notes
X-ray energy 14000 eV @ 0.014 % bandwidth
Beam size 100 µm x 100 µm, Gaussian profile
Flux 1.865 x 10¹⁰ ph/s 1052 Gy/s
Beamstop standard 8.3.1
Data collection software Blu-Ice
Temperature control 297K cold stream was removed but kept on with 297K setpoint

Samples

Name Sample Well composition Drop composition Notes
Mac1 SARS CoV2 NSP3 macrodomain and seed stock. 40 mg/mL Mac1 in 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris pH 8, 5% glycerol 34% (w/vol) PEG 3000 + 100 mM CHES (pH 9.5) 200 nL protein solution + 100 nL well solution + 100 nL seeds Tray 1349 Set up by Galen
Huwe1 88 mg/mL NaCl 2-3.5M NaOac 50-200mM pH 4.84 200 nL protein solution + 200 nL well solution Tray Number 1182 and 1183, at 4C

Data Collection

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 1

Loop location: Watershed
Loop size: 200 µm
Relative Humidity: 90.6% with max flowrate, close to tray

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_1 0 720 0.1 7200 0.1 200 did not sleeve directly under watershed, still getting the hang, had shutter closed for first part, diffraction is a little weak - killed around 540 deg
mac1_1_bg_1 0 720 1 720 1 200 went 200 µm away to fully clear the loop, accidentally overrode the beginning
mac1_1_bg_real 0 720 1 720 1 200 went 100µm down to be slightly below the loop

Takeaway: practice run, try to do better job looping under watershed and move the detector back a bit


Day 2

tuneup.com
dcscan.com transmission 0.01
divergence.com 0.9
diode.com in
shutter.com on
flux.com

Day 2 Parameters

Parameter Value Notes
X-ray energy 14000 eV @ 0.014 % bandwidth
Beam size 100 µm x 100 µm, Gaussian profile
Flux 1.945 x 10¹⁰ ph/s 1097 Gy/s
Beamstop standard 8.3.1
Data collection software Blu-Ice
Temperature control none cold stream was removed and turned off

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 2

Loop location: Watershed
Loop size: 150 µm
Relative Humidity: 91.1%, 15 flowrate

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_2 0 720 0.1 7200 0.1 300 well E3, plate 1349, diffraction quality varied throughout scan, maybe crystal died at certain points
mac1_2_bg_1 0 720 1 720 1 300 started at same starting phi as crystal, 250 µm away, no height change
mac1_2_bg_2 0 720 1 720 1 300 started at same phi as crystal, went 100 µm down

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 3

Loop location: Watershed
Loop size: 200 µm
Relative Humidity: 87.5%, 15 flowrate

Notes: Turned beamline feedback off as it tries to change the transmission. Redid tuneup and dropped divergence down. Flux: 1.9 x 10¹⁰, 1073 Gy/s with feedback off.

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_4 0 720 0.1 7200 0.1 300 well E3, plate 1349, weak diffraction
mac1_4_2 0 720 0.1 7200 0.1 300 re-centered, weak diffraction, abort

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 5

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_5 0 720 0.1 7200 0.1 300 still weak diffraction
mac1_5_2 0 720 0.1 7200 0.1 300 increased divergence to 0.2, flux is at 3.7 x 10¹⁰, dose is 2089 Gy/s, still bad diffraction

Raster: nothing

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 6

Relative humidity: 97.5%
Dose rate: 1021 Gy/s, divergence 1.2, Se in (attenuation)

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_6_2 0 720 0.1 7200 0.1 300 everything looks good
mac1_6_bg_1 0 720 1 720 1 300 went 200 µm away, transmission may not be correct
mac1_6_bg_2 0 720 1 720 1 300 went 100µm down, transmission may not be correct
mac1_6_bg_3 0 720 1 720 1 300 stayed in same spot, put transmission in blu-ice at 1.25% and collect

JAMES INPUT:

# move sample out of the beam
sample.com 0 0 -1
diode.com in
shutter.com open
divergence.com 2 0.35
flux.com
# note the predicted dose rate in Gy/s
dcsmotor.com transmission 0.0003
flux.com
# note dose rate again. Adjust commanded transmission until dose rate is > 1000 Gy/s, but close-ish to it
flux.com
divergence.com 1.2
flux.com
# adjust divergence to get as close as you like to 1000 Gy/s
# now go to BLU-ICE and hit "update". This will load the actual transmittance into the run info
flux.com
shutter.com close
diode.com out
# put sample back in beam
sample.com 0 0 1

Takeaway: make sure you are running new adxv with small spots and weak data turned on. ALSO do NOT hit update on Blu-Ice, just enter the transmission value

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 7

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_7 0 720 0.1 7200 0.1 300 gorgeous, first collection where we actually know what the beamline is doing, possibly some damage by the end, took a post exposure picture
mac1_7_bg_1 0 720 1 720 1 300 went 250 µm away
mac1_7_bg_2 0 720 1 720 1 300 went 100 µm down

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 8

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_8 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 diffraction still looks good, crystal lifetime seems better as well
mac1_8_bg_1 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 200 µm away
mac1_8_bg_2 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 100 µm down

** For crystal 8 and forward, message from ALS that beam is longitudinally unstable**

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 9

Check everything - all good!!

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_9 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 all good
mac1_9_bg_1 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 250 µm away
mac1_9_bg_2 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 100 µm down

Humidity Box, Huwe1 Crystal 1

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_1 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 diffraction is nice but not as strong as Mac1, maybe increase exposure time again

** BEAM DOWN :(**

Beam back, but lower current. Did tune up and adjusted divergence to get higher dose rate with lower current.

Humidity Box, Huwe1 Crystal 2

Loop size: 300 µm and still probably too small

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_2 0 720 0.1 7200 0.1 350 diffraction to 1.9, def damaged, lost some frames in the middle to accidentally closing the shutter
huwe1_2_bg_1 0 720 1 720 1 350 went 300 µm away
huwe1_2_bg_2 0 720 1 720 1 350 went 100 µm down

Humidity Box, Huwe1 Crystal 3

Loop size: 300 µm and still probably too small

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_3 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 crystal lifetime seems better and crystal sat better in the loop
huwe1_3_bg_1 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 300 µm away
huwe1_3_bg_2 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 100 µm down

** Current started increasing slowly during bg 1**

Humidity Box, Huwe1 Crystal 4

Loop size: 300 µm and still probably too small

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_4 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 very nice diffraction
huwe1_4_bg_1 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 300 µm away
huwe1_4_bg_2 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 100 µm down

Humidity Box, Huwe1 Crystal 5

Loop size: 300 µm and still probably too small

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_5 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 very nice diffraction
huwe1_5_bg_1 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 250 µm away
huwe1_5_bg_2 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 100 µm down

Day 3

Tuneup done
Transmission check: 1.9 x 10¹⁰ ph/s or 1075 Gy/s
Beam current: stable at 500 mA

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 10

Source: Take from hanging drop tray

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_10 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 looks good but some lifetime issues
mac1_10_bg_1 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 300 µm away
mac1_10_bg_2 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 100 µm down

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 11

Source: Take from hanging drop tray

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_11 0 720 0.1 7200 0.01 250 lost higher res, detector was not very happy, stalled out at 7029 frames
mac1_11_bg_1 0 720 1 720 0.1 250 went 300 µm away
mac1_11_bg_2 0 720 1 720 0.1 250 went 100µm down

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 12

Source: Take from hanging drop tray
Relative Humidity: 90.3%

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_12 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 diffraction looks good
mac1_12_bg_1 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 300 µm away
mac1_12_bg_2 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 100µm down

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 13

Source: Take from hanging drop tray
Relative Humidity: 89.3%
Notes: played with watershed - turned on temp control to see if we can get to higher humidity

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_13 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 looks good
mac1_13_bg_1 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 250 µm away
mac1_13_bg_2 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 100µm down

Watershed, Huwe1 Crystal 6

Loop size: 300 µm and still probably too small
Relative Humidity: 88.6%

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_6 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 looks good
huwe1_6_bg_1 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 went 300 µm away
huwe1_6_bg_2 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 went 100µm down

Watershed, Huwe1 Crystal 7

Loop size: 300 µm and still probably too small
Relative Humidity: 88.1%

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_7 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 looks good
huwe1_7_bg_1 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 300 µm away
huwe1_7_bg_2 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 went 100µm down

Watershed, Huwe1 Crystal 8

Relative Humidity: 87.8%
Treatment: dip in Al's oil

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_8 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 diffraction is a little meh, oil background varying by frame

Watershed, Huwe1 Crystal 9

Relative Humidity: 87.8%
Treatment: dip in Al's oil and then back in res to try to remove excess

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_9 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 crystal is all cracked, not much diffraction

Watershed, Huwe1 Crystal 10

Relative Humidity: 87.5%
Treatment: dip in paratone oil

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_10 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 less oil background, but low res diffraction

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 14

Relative Humidity: 87.5%
Treatment: let paratone oil diffuse in for short time (maybe 30 s)

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_14 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 no oil background, around 360 crystal is dying and mosaicity is increasing
mac1_14_bg_1 0 720 0.1 720 0.5 250 went 300µm away

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 15

Relative Humidity: 87.5%
Treatment: put paratone oil more on top of the drop

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_15 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 good diffraction, no background, but only shortlived, crystal is dying

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 16

Relative Humidity: 87.5%
Treatment: turn cryostream on and set at 297K, no oil

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_16 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 dead

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 17

Treatment: turn cryostream on and set at 297K, no oil

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_17 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 dead

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 18

Treatment: turn cryostream on and set at 297K, paratone oil diffusion, wait a little bit

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_18 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 diffraction only lasts for short time, about 150 degree

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 19

Treatment: turn cryostream on and set at 297K, dip in paratone

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_19 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 dead

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 20

Treatment: turn cryostream on and set at 297K, dip in NVH

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_20 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 no crystal ? but oil background was cleaner

Humidity Box, Huwe1 Crystal 11

Treatment: turn cryostream on and set at 297K, dip in NVH

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_11 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 dead and cracked

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 21

Treatment: turn cryostream off, dip in NVH

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_21 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 saw some weak diffraction and then the beam went down

Beam back
Do tune up and check transmission: 1.835 x 10¹⁰ ph/s, 1035 Gy/s

Watershed, Mac1 Crystal 22

Source: Sitting drop, put sleeve close

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_22 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 looks good, have rad damage towards the end
mac1_22_bg_1 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 200 µm away
mac1_22_bg_2 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 100 µm down

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 23

Source: Hanging drop
Treatment: stream on 310 K
Whoops sleeve had no reservoir liquid

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_23 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 heat dehydrated the crystal

Humidity Box, Mac1 Crystal 24

Source: Hanging drop
Treatment: stream on 310 K

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
mac1_24 0 720 0.1 7200 0.05 250 diffraction! Some rad damage towards end as typical
mac1_24_bg_1 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 350 µm away
mac1_24_bg_2 0 720 1 720 0.5 250 went 100 µm down

Humidity Box, Huwe1 Crystal 12

Source: Hanging drop
Treatment: stream on 310 K

Prefix φ0 (deg.) φ1 (deg.) ∆φ (deg.) Images ∆t (s) d (mm) Notes
huwe1_12 0 360 0.1 3600 0.05 350 diffraction!, some damage at end
huwe1_12_bg_1 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 went 250 µm away, have some dried salt
huwe1_12_bg_2 0 360 1 360 0.5 350 went 100 µm down, some dried salt

Comments